Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReadman, GDen
dc.contributor.authorOwen, SFen
dc.contributor.authorKnowles, TGen
dc.contributor.authorMurrell, JCen
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-09T15:52:59Z
dc.date.available2017-10-09T15:52:59Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-02en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10034
dc.description.abstract

There is a need to ensure that the care and welfare for fish maintained in the laboratory are to the highest standards. This extends to the use of anaesthetics for both scientific study, humane killing and euthanasia at end of life. An anaesthetic should not induce negative behaviours and fish should not seek to avoid the anaesthetic. Surprisingly little information is available to facilitate a humane choice of anaesthetic agent for fish despite over 100 years of use and the millions of fish currently held in thousands of laboratories worldwide. Using a chemotaxic choice chamber we found different species specific behavioural responses among four closely related fish species commonly held in the laboratory, exposed to three widely used anaesthetic agents. As previously found for zebrafish (Danio rerio), the use of MS-222 and benzocaine also appears to induce avoidance behaviours in medaka (Oryzias latipes); but etomidate could provide an alternative choice. Carp (Cyprinus carpio), although closely related to zebrafish showed avoidance behaviours to etomidate, but not benzocaine or MS-222; and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) showed no avoidance to the three agents tested. We were unable to ascertain avoidance responses in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and suggest different test paradigms are required for that species.

en
dc.format.extent7102 - ?en
dc.languageengen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen
dc.subjectAnestheticsen
dc.subjectAnimalsen
dc.subjectEuthanasiaen
dc.subjectFishesen
dc.subjectHydrogen-Ion Concentrationen
dc.subjectSolventsen
dc.titleSpecies specific anaesthetics for fish anaesthesia and euthanasia.en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28769117en
plymouth.issue1en
plymouth.volume7en
plymouth.publication-statusPublished onlineen
plymouth.journalSci Repen
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-017-06917-2en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA06 Agriculture, Veterinary and Food Science
dc.publisher.placeEnglanden
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-06-20en
dc.identifier.eissn2045-2322en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1038/s41598-017-06917-2en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-08-02en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV