The Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review, Volume 04 - 2012
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/8782
2024-03-29T09:20:02ZEnforcement, Rehabilitation and Public Protection: Developments, Issues and Tensions Impacting on the Work of the Probation Service
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/8968
Enforcement, Rehabilitation and Public Protection: Developments, Issues and Tensions Impacting on the Work of the Probation Service
Walker, Sam
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZTo What Extent has Muncie’s ‘Punitive Turn’ Become A Global Trend in International Youth Justice?
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/8967
To What Extent has Muncie’s ‘Punitive Turn’ Become A Global Trend in International Youth Justice?
Cook, Laura
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZIn What Ways Has Criminology Sought to Understand the Rave Movement as Organised Deviance?
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/8966
In What Ways Has Criminology Sought to Understand the Rave Movement as Organised Deviance?
Brown, Steven
2012-01-01T00:00:00ZA Court of Law or a Court of Conscience: A Critique of the Decision in Re A (Children)
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/8965
A Court of Law or a Court of Conscience: A Critique of the Decision in Re A (Children)
Offer, Laura
This article critiques the legal reasoning adopted by the Court of Appeal in Re A (Children) – the controversial case which addressed the separation of conjoined twins Rose and Grace Attard (or 'Mary and Jodie'). Separation would ensure survival for Jodie and death for Mary; as such, the Court of Appeal was required to consider whether separation constituted murder or whether it was justifiable as a protective measure for Jodie. In this article, the author examines the separate lines of reasoning adopted by each of the three judges in Re A, explores the precedents used to justify separation, discusses the distinction between 'morality' and 'ethics', and the impact the decision in Re A has had on subsequent 'conjoined twins' cases.
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z